[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db80adb8b8006fbdeee77a386feabb81537d27e6.camel@siemens.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 07:20:07 +0000
From: "Sverdlin, Alexander" <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>
To: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"christophe.leroy@...roup.eu" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
CC: "hui.wang@...onical.com" <hui.wang@...onical.com>, "mwalle@...nel.org"
<mwalle@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "florent.trinh-thai@...soprasteria.com"
<florent.trinh-thai@...soprasteria.com>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eeprom: at25: convert to spi-mem API
Hi Greg,
On Wed, 2025-11-05 at 08:15 +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > Replace the RAW SPI accesses with spi-mem API. The latter will fall back to
> > > RAW SPI accesses if spi-mem callbacks are not implemented by a controller
> > > driver.
> >
> > With this patch (kernel v6.17.1) our powerpc boards are totally unstable, we
> > get multiple random Oops due to bad memory accesses.
> >
> > With this commit reverted the board is stable again.
> >
> > The SPI driver is:
> >
> > CONFIG_SPI=y
> > CONFIG_SPI_MASTER=y
> > CONFIG_SPI_MEM=y
> > CONFIG_SPI_FSL_LIB=y
> > CONFIG_SPI_FSL_CPM=y
> > CONFIG_SPI_FSL_SPI=y
> >
> > How can we further investigate the issue ?
>
> We can revert it until it comes back working properly. Can you send a
> revert so that I can apply it?
what is known for sure is that it triggers a bug in SPI_FSL_CPM [1],
which probably justifies a revert in -stable. But there are no indications the
patch in question misbehaves itself as of now. I'm going to KASAN it on all the
HW I can get my hands on this week.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/764858d5-5633-4aeb-aabe-52f9eb1eb530@csgroup.eu/
--
Alexander Sverdlin
Siemens AG
www.siemens.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists