lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <neykh5ldiksowcyqomqlx7wwdo3jrofpn7cyndgsic5ckcemik@gngyem6bmdsy>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 02:55:03 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: david@...t.cz
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        Casey Connolly <casey.connolly@...aro.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] arch: arm64: qcom: sdm845-enchilada: Specify panel
 name within the compatible

On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 11:16:10PM +0100, David Heidelberg via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
> 
> sofef00 is name of the DDIC, it doesn't contain name of the panel used.
> The DDIC is also paired with other panels, so make clear which panel is
> used.
> 
> cosmetic: sort the node.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-enchilada.dts | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-enchilada.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-enchilada.dts
> index a259eb9d45ae0..8aead6dc25e00 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-enchilada.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-enchilada.dts
> @@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ battery: battery {
>  };
>  
>  &display_panel {
> -	status = "okay";
> +	compatible = "samsung,sofef00-ams628nw01", "samsung,sofef00";

This breaks the ABI. Please describe, why it is sensible. Other patches
should describe whether the old DTs will continue to work or not.

>  
> -	compatible = "samsung,sofef00";
> +	status = "okay";
>  };
>  
>  &bq27441_fg {
> 
> -- 
> 2.51.0
> 
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ