[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e464f5d-f4ed-4ee5-b966-fc7de586340a@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:51:00 +0530
From: Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@....qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
Ulf Hansson
<ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Jagadeesh Kona <jagadeesh.kona@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add missing VDD_MXC links
On 11/5/2025 1:01 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
>
> To make sure that power rail is voted for, wire it up to its consumers.
>
> Fixes: 9bd07f2c558f ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add in CAMCC for sc8280xp")
> Fixes: 152d1faf1e2f ("arm64: dts: qcom: add SC8280XP platform")
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> index 5334adebf278..643a61cc91b4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
> @@ -4586,8 +4586,10 @@ camcc: clock-controller@...0000 {
> <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
> <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK_A>,
> <&sleep_clk>;
> - power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MMCX>;
> - required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MMCX>,
> + <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MXC>;
I see that none of the CAMCC PLLs/clocks are on MXC rail on SC8280XP target.
So, MXC support is not required for CAMCC.
Thanks,
Imran
> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>,
> + <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> #reset-cells = <1>;
> #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> @@ -5788,8 +5790,12 @@ remoteproc_nsp0: remoteproc@...00000 {
> clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
> clock-names = "xo";
>
> - power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_NSP>;
> - power-domain-names = "nsp";
> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_NSP>,
> + <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_CX>,
> + <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MXC>;
> + power-domain-names = "nsp",
> + "cx",
> + "mxc";
>
> memory-region = <&pil_nsp0_mem>;
>
> @@ -5919,8 +5925,12 @@ remoteproc_nsp1: remoteproc@...00000 {
> clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
> clock-names = "xo";
>
> - power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_NSP>;
> - power-domain-names = "nsp";
> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_NSP>,
> + <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_CX>,
> + <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MXC>;
> + power-domain-names = "nsp",
> + "cx",
> + "mxc";
>
> memory-region = <&pil_nsp1_mem>;
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists