lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251105094750.GF8064@google.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 09:47:50 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Corey Minyard <corey@...yard.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the mfd-fixes tree

On Mon, 27 Oct 2025, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
> commits (but the same patches):
> 
>   91a3e1f5453a ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Check for devm_mfd_add_devices() failure")
>   fdff3cadeea9 ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check in probe()")
> 
> These are commits
> 
>   4af66c2bcab0 ("mfd: ls2kbmc: check for devm_mfd_add_devices() failure")
>   0892507f4a0b ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check in probe()")
> 
> in Linus' tree.

This is because Corey applied patches that they shouldn't have done,
despite being expressively requested not to!

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251009095611.GC8757@google.com/

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ