lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG2KctonFbbN9KrKWweQWaRKNN=rZkpWQCmyyY2rKfcAUzF=sA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 17:20:38 -0800
From: Samuel Wu <wusamuel@...gle.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, tuhaowen@...ontech.com, 
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] PM: Support aborting sleep during filesystem sync

On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 10:52 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 10:01 PM Samuel Wu <wusamuel@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > At the start of suspend and hibernate, filesystems will sync to save the
> > current state of the device. However, the long tail of the filesystem
> > sync can take upwards of 25 seconds. If during this filesystem sync
> > there is some wakeup or abort signal, it will not be processed until the
> > sync is complete; from a user's perspective, this looks like the device
> > is unresponsive to any form of input.
> >
> > This patch adds functionality to handle a sleep abort signal when in
> > the filesystem sync phase of suspend or hibernate. This topic was first
> > discussed by Saravana Kannan at LPC 2024 [1], where the general
> > consensus was to allow filesystem sync on a parallel thread. In case of
> > abort, the suspend process will stop waiting on an in-progress
> > filesystem sync, and continue by aborting suspend before the filesystem
> > sync is complete.
> >
> > Additionally, there is extra care needed to account for back-to-back
> > sleeps while maintaining functionality to immediately abort during the
> > filesystem sync stage. Furthermore, in the case of the back-to-back
> > sleeps, a subsequent filesystem sync is needed to ensure the latest
> > files are synced right before sleep. If necessary, a subsequent sleep's
> > filesystem sync will be queued, and will only start when the previous
> > sleep's filesystem sync has finished. While waiting for the previous
> > sleep's filesystem sync to finish, the subsequent sleep will still abort
> > early if a wakeup event is triggered, solving the original issue of
> > filesystem sync blocking abort.
> >
> > [1]: https://lpc.events/event/18/contributions/1845/
> >
> > Suggested-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Wu <wusamuel@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v6:
> > - Use spin_lock_irq() in thread context
> > - Use dedicated ordered workqueue for sync work items
> > - Use a counter instead of two bools for synchronization
> > - Queue fs_sync if it's not already pending on workqueue
> > - pm_wakeup_clear(0) is prequisite to this feature, so move it within function
> > - Updated commit text for motive of back-to-back fs syncs
> > - Tighter lock/unlock around setup, checks, and loop
> > - Fix function definitions for CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n
> > - v5 link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251017233907.2305303-1-wusamuel@google.com/
> >
> > Changes in v5:
> > - Update spin_lock() to spin_lock_irqsave() since abort can be in IRQ context
> > - Updated changelog description to be more precise regarding continuing abort
> >   sleep before fs_sync() is complete
> > - Rename abort_sleep_during_fs_sync() to pm_stop_waiting_for_fs_sync()
> > - Simplify from a goto to do-while in pm_sleep_fs_sync()
> > - v4 link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250911185314.2377124-1-wusamuel@google.com
> >
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Removed patch 1/3 of v3 as it is already picked up on linux-pm
> > - Squashed patches 2/3 and 3/3 from v3 into this single patch
> > - Added abort during fs_sync functionality to hibernate in addition to suspend
> > - Moved variables and functions for abort from power/suspend.c to power/main.c
> > - Renamed suspend_fs_sync_with_abort() to pm_sleep_fs_sync()
> > - Renamed suspend_abort_fs_sync() to abort_sleep_during_fs_sync()
> > - v3 link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250821004237.2712312-1-wusamuel@google.com/
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Split v2 patch into 3 patches
> > - Moved pm_wakeup_clear() outside of if(sync_on_suspend_enabled) condition
> > - Updated documentation and comments within kernel/power/suspend.c
> > - v2 link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250812232126.1814253-1-wusamuel@google.com/
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Added documentation for suspend_abort_fs_sync()
> > - Made suspend_fs_sync_lock and suspend_fs_sync_complete declaration static
> > - v1 link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250815004635.3684650-1-wusamuel@google.com
> >
> >  drivers/base/power/wakeup.c |  8 ++++
> >  include/linux/suspend.h     |  4 ++
> >  kernel/power/hibernate.c    |  5 ++-
> >  kernel/power/main.c         | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  kernel/power/suspend.c      |  4 +-
> >  5 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
> > index d1283ff1080b..689c16b08b38 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
> > @@ -570,6 +570,13 @@ static void wakeup_source_activate(struct wakeup_source *ws)
> >
> >         /* Increment the counter of events in progress. */
> >         cec = atomic_inc_return(&combined_event_count);
> > +       /*
> > +        * wakeup_source_activate() aborts sleep only if events_check_enabled
> > +        * is set (see pm_wakeup_pending()). Similarly, abort sleep during
> > +        * fs_sync only if events_check_enabled is set.
> > +        */
> > +       if (events_check_enabled)
> > +               pm_stop_waiting_for_fs_sync();
> >
> >         trace_wakeup_source_activate(ws->name, cec);
> >  }
> > @@ -899,6 +906,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_wakeup_pending);
> >  void pm_system_wakeup(void)
> >  {
> >         atomic_inc(&pm_abort_suspend);
> > +       pm_stop_waiting_for_fs_sync();
> >         s2idle_wake();
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_system_wakeup);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/suspend.h b/include/linux/suspend.h
> > index b02876f1ae38..4795f55f9cbe 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/suspend.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/suspend.h
> > @@ -450,6 +450,8 @@ void restore_processor_state(void);
> >  extern int register_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> >  extern int unregister_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> >  extern void ksys_sync_helper(void);
> > +extern void pm_stop_waiting_for_fs_sync(void);
> > +extern int pm_sleep_fs_sync(void);
> >  extern void pm_report_hw_sleep_time(u64 t);
> >  extern void pm_report_max_hw_sleep(u64 t);
> >  void pm_restrict_gfp_mask(void);
> > @@ -505,6 +507,8 @@ static inline void pm_restrict_gfp_mask(void) {}
> >  static inline void pm_restore_gfp_mask(void) {}
> >
> >  static inline void ksys_sync_helper(void) {}
> > +static inline void pm_stop_waiting_for_fs_sync(void) {}
> > +static inline int pm_sleep_fs_sync(void) { return 0; }
> >
> >  #define pm_notifier(fn, pri)   do { (void)(fn); } while (0)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/power/hibernate.c b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> > index 53166ef86ba4..1874fde4b4f3 100644
> > --- a/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> > +++ b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> > @@ -820,7 +820,10 @@ int hibernate(void)
> >         if (error)
> >                 goto Restore;
> >
> > -       ksys_sync_helper();
> > +       error = pm_sleep_fs_sync();
> > +       if (error)
> > +               goto Restore;
> > +
> >         if (filesystem_freeze_enabled)
> >                 filesystems_freeze();
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/power/main.c b/kernel/power/main.c
> > index a6cbc3f4347a..23ca87a172a4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/power/main.c
> > +++ b/kernel/power/main.c
> > @@ -582,6 +582,84 @@ bool pm_sleep_transition_in_progress(void)
> >  {
> >         return pm_suspend_in_progress() || hibernation_in_progress();
> >  }
> > +
> > +static int pm_sleep_fs_syncs_queued;
> > +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pm_sleep_fs_sync_lock);
> > +static DECLARE_COMPLETION(pm_sleep_fs_sync_complete);
> > +static struct workqueue_struct *pm_fs_sync_wq;
> > +
> > +static int __init pm_start_fs_sync_workqueue(void)
> > +{
> > +       pm_fs_sync_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("pm_fs_sync_wq", 0);
> > +
> > +       return pm_fs_sync_wq ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * pm_stop_waiting_for_fs_sync - Abort fs_sync to abort sleep early
> > + *
> > + * This function causes the suspend process to stop waiting on an in-progress
> > + * filesystem sync, such that the suspend process can be aborted before the
> > + * filesystem sync is complete.
> > + */
> > +void pm_stop_waiting_for_fs_sync(void)
> > +{
> > +       unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +       spin_lock_irqsave(&pm_sleep_fs_sync_lock, flags);
> > +       complete(&pm_sleep_fs_sync_complete);
> > +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm_sleep_fs_sync_lock, flags);
> > +}
>
> Apart from the kernel test robot reports,

Of course, I'll fix this in v7.

> pm_stop_waiting_for_fs_sync() has become slightly too heavy for
> calling it from wakeup_source_activate().

Trying to understand- are you saying spin_lock_irqsave() makes
pm_stop_waiting_for_fs_sync() too slow?

> Waking up the suspend process from there should be sufficient.  The
> completion is not necessary for that in principle.

Can you elaborate more on what "there" means and why completion isn't
necessary? From what I can see, the only way to abort the suspend
_early_ is with the completion.

Thanks!
Sam

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ