linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/1] replace uses of system_wq with system_percpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <176234128319.20998.3148035011153421288.b4-ty@linaro.org>
Date: Wed,  5 Nov 2025 12:15:06 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] replace uses of system_wq with system_percpu_wq

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>


On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:16:27 +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> === Current situation: problems ===
> 
> Let's consider a nohz_full system with isolated CPUs: wq_unbound_cpumask is
> set to the housekeeping CPUs, for !WQ_UNBOUND the local CPU is selected.
> 
> This leads to different scenarios if a work item is scheduled on an
> isolated CPU where "delay" value is 0 or greater then 0:
>         schedule_delayed_work(, 0);
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] gpio: cdev: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
      https://git.kernel.org/brgl/linux/c/b6d31cd41814a33c1a22b8c676131820440cc44e

Best regards,
-- 
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>