[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251105013506.358-1-gouhao@uniontech.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 09:35:06 +0800
From: Gou Hao <gouhao@...ontech.com>
To: cem@...nel.org,
corbet@....net,
hch@....de,
djwong@...nel.org
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gouhaojake@....com,
guanwentao@...ontech.com
Subject: [PATCH V2] xfs-doc: Fix typo error
Hi Christoph, Darrick,
Thank you for the reviews. Here is the v2 patch with the commit message fixed as suggested.
Subject: [PATCH V2] xfs-doc: Fix typo error
Online fsck may take longer than offline fsck...
Signed-off-by: Gou Hao <gouhao@...ontech.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
---
Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
index 8cbcd3c26434..55e727b5f12e 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ sharing and lock acquisition rules as the regular filesystem.
This means that scrub cannot take *any* shortcuts to save time, because doing
so could lead to concurrency problems.
In other words, online fsck is not a complete replacement for offline fsck, and
-a complete run of online fsck may take longer than online fsck.
+a complete run of online fsck may take longer than offline fsck.
However, both of these limitations are acceptable tradeoffs to satisfy the
different motivations of online fsck, which are to **minimize system downtime**
and to **increase predictability of operation**.
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists