[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <597d479f-4f1d-4cae-b15f-21ecc73a35bf@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 12:11:35 +0000
From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>
To: "Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
'James Morse' <james.morse@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
"carl@...amperecomputing.com" <carl@...amperecomputing.com>,
"lcherian@...vell.com" <lcherian@...vell.com>,
"bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com" <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>,
"baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com" <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"peternewman@...gle.com" <peternewman@...gle.com>,
"dfustini@...libre.com" <dfustini@...libre.com>,
"amitsinght@...vell.com" <amitsinght@...vell.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>,
Koba Ko <kobak@...dia.com>, Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>,
"fenghuay@...dia.com" <fenghuay@...dia.com>,
"baisheng.gao@...soc.com" <baisheng.gao@...soc.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@....com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Hanjun Guo
<guohanjun@...wei.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 23/29] arm_mpam: Add mpam_msmon_read() to read monitor
value
Hi Shaopeng,
On 11/5/25 08:32, Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Hello James,
>
>> Reading a monitor involves configuring what you want to monitor, and reading
>> the value. Components made up of multiple MSC may need values from each
>> MSC. MSCs may take time to configure, returning 'not ready'.
>> The maximum 'not ready' time should have been provided by firmware.
>>
>> Add mpam_msmon_read() to hide all this. If (one of) the MSC returns not ready,
>> then wait the full timeout value before trying again.
>>
>> CC: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>
>> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
[...]
>> +/* Call with MSC lock held */
>> +static void __ris_msmon_read(void *arg) {
>> + u64 now;
>> + bool nrdy = false;
>> + struct mon_read *m = arg;
>> + struct mon_cfg *ctx = m->ctx;
>> + struct mpam_msc_ris *ris = m->ris;
>> + struct mpam_props *rprops = &ris->props;
>> + struct mpam_msc *msc = m->ris->vmsc->msc;
>> + u32 mon_sel, ctl_val, flt_val, cur_ctl, cur_flt;
>> +
>> + if (!mpam_mon_sel_lock(msc)) {
>> + m->err = -EIO;
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + mon_sel = FIELD_PREP(MSMON_CFG_MON_SEL_MON_SEL,
>> ctx->mon) |
>> + FIELD_PREP(MSMON_CFG_MON_SEL_RIS, ris->ris_idx);
>> + mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MON_SEL, mon_sel);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Read the existing configuration to avoid re-writing the same values.
>> + * This saves waiting for 'nrdy' on subsequent reads.
>> + */
>> + read_msmon_ctl_flt_vals(m, &cur_ctl, &cur_flt);
>> + clean_msmon_ctl_val(&cur_ctl);
>> + gen_msmon_ctl_flt_vals(m, &ctl_val, &flt_val);
>> + if (cur_flt != flt_val || cur_ctl != (ctl_val | MSMON_CFG_x_CTL_EN))
>> + write_msmon_ctl_flt_vals(m, ctl_val, flt_val);
>
> When reading the CSU counter of a different control group, the counter is cleared to 0 by the write_msmon_ctl_flt_vals().
>
>> + switch (m->type) {
>> + case mpam_feat_msmon_csu:
>> + now = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, CSU);
>> + if (mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_csu_hw_nrdy,
>> rprops))
>> + nrdy = now & MSMON___NRDY;
>> + break;
>
> The first time read the counter(MSMON_CSU), all bits except nrdy are 0.
I'm trying to understand your problem. Isn't what you are describing the
intended behaviour of the nrdy bit? It takes some time to get a count of
the cache utilization so if it's not ready this is set and the driver
retries.
>
> This means when check the cache monitoring value the first time,
> cat mon_data/mon_L3_0*/llc_occupancy
> the result will be 0.
> From the second time, the result will return to normal.
This is not expected. On creating a new ctrl_mon group, generating some
memory traffic and checking the llc_occumpancy I see a non-zero value on
my setup. Not sure why you wouldn't.
>
> Best regards,
> Shaopeng TAN
>
Thanks,
Ben
Powered by blists - more mailing lists