[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3fe70726-80d6-a84a-4101-446fd8b49209@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 18:35:58 +0200 (EET)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Alex Davis <alex47794@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Regression] depmod fails on kernel 6.17.1 rc1
On Thu, 6 Nov 2025, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 06:15:57PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > So I'm seeing this with an allmodconfig build too:
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> > > depmod: ERROR: Cycle detected: 8250 -> 8250_base -> 8250
> > > depmod: ERROR: Found 2 modules in dependency cycles!
> >
> > I'm surprised it took so long to people to start complaining.
> >
> > So, some of those are modules? Can you share the
> >
> > grep 8250 .config
> >
> > part?
>
> See above.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/87frc3sd8d.fsf@posteo.net/
I wonder if 8250_rsa.o can be put into 8250_base.o where most of its
callers are anyway?
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists