[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251106200541.GG1732817@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 16:05:41 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: "Longia, Amandeep Kaur" <amandeepkaur.longia@....com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 6
On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 11:42:36AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > Currently, I am bisecting between kernel tags 'next-20251106' and 'next-20251105' to identify the culprit commit causing this issue.
>
> Pretty sure that your beginning "good" should be Linux v6.18-rc4 and
> not linux-next. "bad" should be next-20251106.
Thorsten pointed this out in the morning:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251106185814.GA1708009@nvidia.com
Alot of bots and people have used this series before it was merged so
I'm not sure what the special condition is to trigger this.. Does the
above fix it?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists