[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0abf9a34-232b-4840-b592-672aa277509f@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:25:38 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/tracing: Add basic test for trace_marker_raw
file
On 11/4/25 16:47, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 14:51:49 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>>
>> Commit 64cf7d058a00 ("tracing: Have trace_marker use per-cpu data to read
>> user space") made an update that fixed both trace_marker and
>> trace_marker_raw. But the small difference made to trace_marker_raw had a
>> blatant bug in it that any basic testing would have uncovered.
>> Unfortunately, the self tests have tests for trace_marker but nothing for
>> trace_marker_raw which allowed the bug to get upstream.
>>
>> Add basic selftests to test trace_marker_raw so that this doesn't happen
>> again.
>>
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
>
Thanks. Applied to ksleftest next for 6.19-rc1.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists