[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKmqyKOMFdKqcYN1Nuz224nczaQMmXhk=H6Vx6n+XLRpeVQdNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 09:18:04 +1000
From: Alistair Francis <alistair23@...il.com>
To: Martin George <martinus.gpy@...il.com>
Cc: hare@...e.de, kbusch@...nel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, hch@....de,
sagi@...mberg.me, kch@...dia.com, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvmet-auth: update sc_c in target host hash calculation
On Thu, Nov 6, 2025 at 11:05 PM Martin George <martinus.gpy@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2025-11-05 at 09:14 +1000, alistair23@...il.com wrote:
> > From: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@....com>
> >
> > Commit 7e091add9c43 "nvme-auth: update sc_c in host response" added
> > the sc_c variable to the dhchap queue context structure which is
> > appropriately set during negotiate and then used in the host
> > response.
> >
> > This breaks secure concat connections with a Linux target as the
> > target
> > code wasn't updated at the same time. This patch fixes this by adding
> > a
> > new sc_c variable to the host hash calculations.
> >
> > Fixes: 7e091add9c43 ("nvme-auth: update sc_c in host response")
> > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@....com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Rebase on v6.18-rc4
> > - Add Fixes tag
> >
> > drivers/nvme/host/auth.c | 1 +
> > drivers/nvme/target/auth.c | 5 +++--
> > drivers/nvme/target/fabrics-cmd-auth.c | 1 +
> > drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/auth.c b/drivers/nvme/host/auth.c
> > index a01178caf15b..19980122d3d5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/auth.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/auth.c
> > @@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ static int
> > nvme_auth_dhchap_setup_host_response(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,
> > ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, buf, 2);
> > if (ret)
> > goto out;
> > + memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
> > *buf = chap->sc_c;
> > ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, buf, 1);
> > if (ret)
>
> This memset in host/auth.c doesn't seem to serve any purpose. Also
> given your patch is intended to modify the target behavior for sc_c
> handling, maybe you should restrict the patch to target side updates
> alone.
>
> All the memset cleanup in both the host/auth.c & target/auth.c should
> ideally be done in a separate patch, and not part of this current
> patch.
Yeah, I realised I don't actually need any of them. They have been removed in v3
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/auth.c b/drivers/nvme/target/auth.c
> > index 02c23998e13c..f54a1425262d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvme/target/auth.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/auth.c
> > @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ int nvmet_auth_host_hash(struct nvmet_req *req,
> > u8 *response,
> > const char *hash_name;
> > u8 *challenge = req->sq->dhchap_c1;
> > struct nvme_dhchap_key *transformed_key;
> > - u8 buf[4], sc_c = ctrl->concat ? 1 : 0;
> > + u8 buf[4];
> > int ret;
> >
> > hash_name = nvme_auth_hmac_name(ctrl->shash_id);
> > @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ int nvmet_auth_host_hash(struct nvmet_req *req,
> > u8 *response,
> > ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, buf, 2);
> > if (ret)
> > goto out;
> > - *buf = sc_c;
> > + *buf = req->sq->sc_c;
> > ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, buf, 1);
> > if (ret)
> > goto out;
> > @@ -378,6 +378,7 @@ int nvmet_auth_host_hash(struct nvmet_req *req,
> > u8 *response,
> > ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, ctrl->hostnqn, strlen(ctrl-
> > >hostnqn));
> > if (ret)
> > goto out;
> > + memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
> > ret = crypto_shash_update(shash, buf, 1);
> > if (ret)
> > goto out;
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/fabrics-cmd-auth.c
> > b/drivers/nvme/target/fabrics-cmd-auth.c
> > index 5d7d913927d8..16894302ebe1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvme/target/fabrics-cmd-auth.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fabrics-cmd-auth.c
> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ static u8 nvmet_auth_negotiate(struct nvmet_req
> > *req, void *d)
> > data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.halen,
> > data->auth_protocol[0].dhchap.dhlen);
> > req->sq->dhchap_tid = le16_to_cpu(data->t_id);
> > + req->sq->sc_c = le16_to_cpu(data->sc_c);
>
> Given sc_c is an unsigned 8bit int, is there really a need to make this
> endian safe by calling le16_to_cpu()?
No, it's not required. Fixed in v3.
Alistair
>
> -Martin
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists