linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] regulator: pf9453: Fix kernel doc for mux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <176247326348.2483095.9073583896607784960.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:54:23 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Joy Zou <joy.zou@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] regulator: pf9453: Fix kernel doc for
 mux_poll()

On Thu, 06 Nov 2025 12:46:28 +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The validator is not happy:
> 
> Warning: drivers/regulator/pf9453-regulator.c:303 This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
> 
> Update the kernel-doc accordingly.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: pf9453: Fix kernel doc for mux_poll()
      commit: 6bd1ad97eb790570c167d4de4ca59fbc9c33722a

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark