linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] Add driver support for ESWIN eic700 SoC clock controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <039a3a41-c60f-4296-afd9-2bf3467574ca@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 09:20:05 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Xuyang Dong <dongxuyang@...incomputing.com>, mturquette@...libre.com,
 sboyd@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ningyu@...incomputing.com, linmin@...incomputing.com,
 huangyifeng@...incomputing.com, pinkesh.vaghela@...fochips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] Add driver support for ESWIN eic700 SoC clock
 controller

On 06/11/2025 08:57, Xuyang Dong wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
>   Gentle ping. Looking forward to your reply. Thank you very much!

Please do not top post.

You did not add any maintainers of these drivers, so I would not put it
high on our priority list.  Ask yourself - why would community
maintainer like to take unmaintained driver? So the community maintainer
would maintain, right? To add him more work? If that is the case, isn't
better not to take the driver? You see where I am getting at?

Also, I don't see any involvement in reviews from eswin. The only
reviews here where from DT maintainers, Troy and Brian (I hope I did not
miss anyone), so again - you just put all the effort on us and then ping
us...

Best regards,
Krzysztof