linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: i2c: dw: Add Mobileye I2C controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5005364.OV4Wx5bFTl@benoit.monin>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 10:42:40 +0100
From: Benoît Monin <benoit.monin@...tlin.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
 Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
 Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
 Clark Williams <clrkwllms@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
 Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
 Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
 Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>,
 Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
 Dmitry Guzman <dmitry.guzman@...ileye.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: i2c: dw: Add Mobileye I2C controllers

Hi Conor,

On Friday, 31 October 2025 at 15:58:49 CET, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 03:35:39PM +0100, Benoît Monin wrote:
> > Add compatible string for the I2C controllers present in Mobileye
> > Eyeq6Lplus SoC. The same controllers are also present in the EyeQ7H.
> 
> Then where is the compatible for the q7h?
> 
I had both entries in version 1 of the patch but Krzysztof told me to
avoid creating duplicated entries. Should I just drop the EyeQ7H
mention in the commit message?

> pw-bot: changes-requested
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Benoît Monin <benoit.monin@...tlin.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml
> > index d904191bb0c6..bc84631f28d1 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml
> > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ properties:
> >          const: baikal,bt1-sys-i2c
> >        - items:
> >            - enum:
> > +              - mobileye,eyeq6lplus-i2c
> >                - mscc,ocelot-i2c
> >                - sophgo,sg2044-i2c
> >                - thead,th1520-i2c
> > 
> 

Best regards,
-- 
Benoît Monin, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com