[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251106115636.7ab861b3@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 11:56:36 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>,
Aditya Kumar Singh <aditya.kumar.singh@....qualcomm.com>, Jeff Johnson
<jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>, Ath10k List <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Maharaja Kennadyrajan
<maharaja.kennadyrajan@....qualcomm.com>, Miaoqing Pan
<miaoqing.pan@....qualcomm.com>, Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ath-next tree with the ath tree
Hi all,
On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 11:30:37 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the ath-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/mac.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 9222582ec524 ("Revert "wifi: ath12k: Fix missing station power save configuration"")
>
> from the ath tree and commit:
>
> 6917e268c433 ("wifi: ath12k: Defer vdev bring-up until CSA finalize to avoid stale beacon")
>
> from the ath-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/mac.c
> index db351c922018,e79d457e3c03..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/mac.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/mac.c
> @@@ -4209,7 -4286,7 +4267,8 @@@ static void ath12k_mac_bss_info_changed
> {
> struct ath12k_vif *ahvif = arvif->ahvif;
> struct ieee80211_vif *vif = ath12k_ahvif_to_vif(ahvif);
> + struct ieee80211_vif_cfg *vif_cfg = &vif->cfg;
> + struct ath12k_link_vif *tx_arvif;
> struct cfg80211_chan_def def;
> u32 param_id, param_value;
> enum nl80211_band band;
This is now a conflict between the wireless-next tree and the wireless
tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists