[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3e4a92f-5b51-4eee-bfb8-c454add0f0d2@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 10:29:50 +0000
From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, Borislav Petkov
<bp@...en8.de>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Thomas Gleixner
<tglx@...utronix.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, x86@...nel.org,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] powerpc/64s: Do not re-activate batched TLB
flush
On 05/11/2025 02:46, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com> writes:
>
>> From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Since commit b9ef323ea168 ("powerpc/64s: Disable preemption in hash
>> lazy mmu mode") a task can not be preempted while in lazy MMU mode.
>> Therefore, the batch re-activation code is never called, so remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h | 2 --
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 25 -------------------------
>> 2 files changed, 27 deletions(-)
>>
> Since the commit referenced in above disables the preemption in
> arch_enter_lazy_mmu(), so the expectation is that we will never be
> context switched while in lazy_mmu, hence the code changes in
> switch_to() around __flush_tlb_pending() should ideally never be called.
Correct, that's the idea.
> With this analysis - the patch looks good to me. I will give this entire
> patch series a try on Power HW with Hash mmu too (which uses lazy mmu and
> let you know the results of that)!
That'd be very appreciated, thanks a lot!
> For this patch please feel free to add:
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
>
>
> CC: Venkat who also runs CI on linux Power HW for upstream testing :)
Ack, will Cc you both in the next version.
- Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists