[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9506997c56808cc9fd58fe0d384976421d6c9bfc.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 11:51:27 +0100
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>, Vladimir
Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>, Grégory
Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham
I <kishon@...nel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Thomas Bogendoerfer
<tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Benoît Monin
<benoit.monin@...tlin.com>, Maxime Chevallier
<maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>, Tawfik Bayouk
<tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] reset: eyeq: drop device_set_of_node_from_dev()
done by parent
On Sa, 2025-11-01 at 09:53 +0100, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Our parent driver (clk-eyeq) now does the
> device_set_of_node_from_dev(dev, dev->parent)
> call through the newly introduced devm_auxiliary_device_create() helper.
>
> Doing it again in the reset-eyeq probe would be redundant.
> Drop both the WARN_ON() and the device_set_of_node_from_dev() call.
> Also fix the following comment that talks about "our newfound OF node".
>
> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
and
Acked-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
to be merged via the clk tree together with patch 3.
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists