lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <176242884990.2357418.738983327098295220.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 11:34:09 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Haotian Zhang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: fixed: fix GPIO descriptor leak on register
 failure

On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 01:28:28 +0800, Haotian Zhang wrote:
> In the commit referenced by the Fixes tag,
> devm_gpiod_get_optional() was replaced by manual
> GPIO management, relying on the regulator core to release the
> GPIO descriptor. However, this approach does not account for the
> error path: when regulator registration fails, the core never
> takes over the GPIO, resulting in a resource leak.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: fixed: fix GPIO descriptor leak on register failure
      commit: 636f4618b1cd96f6b5a2b8c7c4f665c8533ecf13

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ