lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ba8a1ec-fa17-4564-a174-0b8e8eada061@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 12:04:32 +0000
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
 Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] memory: tegra186-emc: Simplify and handle
 deferred probe with dev_err_probe()


On 11/09/2025 10:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Certain calls, like clk_get, can cause probe deferral and driver should
> handle it.  Use dev_err_probe() to fix that and also change other
> non-deferred errors cases to make the code simpler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186-emc.c | 14 ++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186-emc.c b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186-emc.c
> index 00baa7ab89214b1a151ab0c0a9ab76f90f922478..a0de80afe3e90531fcfb29d20773aed0d04478c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186-emc.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186-emc.c
> @@ -302,9 +302,8 @@ static int tegra_emc_interconnect_init(struct tegra186_emc *emc)
>   
>   remove_nodes:
>   	icc_nodes_remove(&emc->provider);
> -	dev_err(emc->dev, "failed to initialize ICC: %d\n", err);
>   
> -	return err;
> +	return dev_err_probe(emc->dev, err, "failed to initialize ICC\n");
>   }
>   
>   static int tegra186_emc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -319,14 +318,13 @@ static int tegra186_emc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   
>   	emc->bpmp = tegra_bpmp_get(&pdev->dev);
>   	if (IS_ERR(emc->bpmp))
> -		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(emc->bpmp), "failed to get BPMP\n");
> +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(emc->bpmp),
> +				     "failed to get BPMP\n");
>   
>   	emc->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "emc");
> -	if (IS_ERR(emc->clk)) {
> -		err = PTR_ERR(emc->clk);
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get EMC clock: %d\n", err);
> -		goto put_bpmp;
> -	}
> +	if (IS_ERR(emc->clk))
> +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(emc->clk),
> +				     "failed to get EMC clock\n");

I see now that we dropped a 'put_bpmp' here and we should not have. I 
see this is in -next, do you want fix up or I can send a patch?

Thanks
Jon

-- 
nvpublic


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ