lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251107021137.874150-1-pangliyuan1@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 10:11:37 +0800
From: Liyuan Pang <pangliyuan1@...wei.com>
To: <markus.elfring@....de>
CC: <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
	<pangliyuan1@...wei.com>, <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>,
	<wanqian10@...wei.com>, <young.liuyang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubi: fastmap: fix ubi->fm memory leak

On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 16:16:05 +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
>…
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/fastmap.c
>> @@ -1644,3 +1644,15 @@ int ubi_update_fastmap(struct ubi_device *ubi)
>…
>> +void ubi_free_fastmap(struct ubi_device *ubi)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	if (ubi->fm) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < ubi->fm->used_blocks; i++)
> +			kmem_cache_free(ubi_wl_entry_slab, ubi->fm->e[i]);
>…
> +	}
> +}
>…
>
> May the local variable “i” be defined in the loop header?

I think it's better to leave it as it is, most of the code in
ubi defines variables outside the loop header, and defining
"i" in the loop header may cause compilation error in some old
kernel versions that use C89.

Regards,
Liyuan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ