[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DE2L1SAOC55E.E4JY62WJQ2A8@google.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2025 15:54:31 +0000
From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
To: Patrick Roy <patrick.roy@...pus.lmu.de>
Cc: Patrick Roy <roypat@...zon.co.uk>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <corbet@....net>,
<maz@...nel.org>, <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, <joey.gouly@....com>,
<suzuki.poulose@....com>, <yuzenghui@...wei.com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<will@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<luto@...nel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <willy@...radead.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <david@...hat.com>, <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
<Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, <vbabka@...e.cz>, <rppt@...nel.org>,
<surenb@...gle.com>, <mhocko@...e.com>, <song@...nel.org>, <jolsa@...nel.org>,
<ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <andrii@...nel.org>,
<martin.lau@...ux.dev>, <eddyz87@...il.com>, <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
<john.fastabend@...il.com>, <kpsingh@...nel.org>, <sdf@...ichev.me>,
<haoluo@...gle.com>, <jgg@...pe.ca>, <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
<peterx@...hat.com>, <jannh@...gle.com>, <pfalcato@...e.de>,
<shuah@...nel.org>, <seanjc@...gle.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <xmarcalx@...zon.co.uk>,
<kalyazin@...zon.co.uk>, <jackabt@...zon.co.uk>, <derekmn@...zon.co.uk>,
<tabba@...gle.com>, <ackerleytng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] Direct Map Removal Support for guest_memfd
On Wed Sep 24, 2025 at 3:10 PM UTC, Patrick Roy wrote:
> From: Patrick Roy <roypat@...zon.co.uk>
>
> [ based on kvm/next ]
>
> Unmapping virtual machine guest memory from the host kernel's direct map is a
> successful mitigation against Spectre-style transient execution issues: If the
> kernel page tables do not contain entries pointing to guest memory, then any
> attempted speculative read through the direct map will necessarily be blocked
> by the MMU before any observable microarchitectural side-effects happen. This
> means that Spectre-gadgets and similar cannot be used to target virtual machine
> memory. Roughly 60% of speculative execution issues fall into this category [1,
> Table 1].
>
> This patch series extends guest_memfd with the ability to remove its memory
> from the host kernel's direct map, to be able to attain the above protection
> for KVM guests running inside guest_memfd.
>
> Additionally, a Firecracker branch with support for these VMs can be found on
> GitHub [2].
>
> For more details, please refer to the v5 cover letter [v5]. No
> substantial changes in design have taken place since.
>
> === Changes Since v6 ===
>
> - Drop patch for passing struct address_space to ->free_folio(), due to
> possible races with freeing of the address_space. (Hugh)
> - Stop using PG_uptodate / gmem preparedness tracking to keep track of
> direct map state. Instead, use the lowest bit of folio->private. (Mike, David)
> - Do direct map removal when establishing mapping of gmem folio instead
> of at allocation time, due to impossibility of handling direct map
> removal errors in kvm_gmem_populate(). (Patrick)
> - Do TLB flushes after direct map removal, and provide a module
> parameter to opt out from them, and a new patch to export
> flush_tlb_kernel_range() to KVM. (Will)
>
> [1]: https://download.vusec.net/papers/quarantine_raid23.pdf
> [2]: https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/firecracker/tree/feature/secret-hiding
I just got around to trying this out, I checked out this patchset using
its base-commit and grabbed the Firecracker branch. Things seem OK until
I set the secrets_free flag in the Firecracker config which IIUC makes
it set GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_NO_DIRECT_MAP.
If I set it, I find the guest doesn't show anything on the console.
Running it in a VM and attaching GDB suggests that it's entering the
guest repeatedly, it doesn't seem like the vCPU thread is stuck or
anything. I'm a bit clueless about how to debug that (so far, whenever
I've broken KVM, things always exploded very dramatically).
Anyway, if I then kill the firecracker process, the host sometimes
crashes, I think this is the most suggestive splat I've seen:
[ 99.673420][ T2] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff888012804000
[ 99.676216][ T2] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
[ 99.678381][ T2] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
[ 99.680499][ T2] PGD 2e01067 P4D 2e01067 PUD 2e02067 PMD 12801063 PTE 800fffffed7fb020
[ 99.683374][ T2] Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
[ 99.685004][ T2] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2 Comm: kthreadd Not tainted 6.17.0-rc7-00366-g473c46a3cb2a #106 NONE
[ 99.688514][ T2] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.1 11/11/2019
[ 99.691547][ T2] RIP: 0010:clear_page_erms+0x7/0x10
[ 99.693440][ T2] Code: 48 89 47 18 48 89 47 20 48 89 47 28 48 89 47 30 48 89 47 38 48 8d 7f 40 75 d9 90 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 b9 00 10 00 00 31 c0 <f3> aa c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 83 f9 40 73 2a 83 f9 08 73 0f 85 c9
[ 99.700188][ T2] RSP: 0018:ffff88800318fc10 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 99.702321][ T2] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000400dc0 RCX: 0000000000001000
[ 99.705100][ T2] RDX: ffffea00004a0100 RSI: ffffea00004a0200 RDI: ffff888012804000
[ 99.707861][ T2] RBP: 0000000000000801 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 99.710648][ T2] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000002
[ 99.713412][ T2] R13: 0000000000000801 R14: ffffea00004a0100 R15: ffffffff81f4df80
[ 99.716191][ T2] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880bbf28000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 99.719316][ T2] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 99.721648][ T2] CR2: ffff888012804000 CR3: 0000000007583001 CR4: 0000000000372eb0
[ 99.724421][ T2] Call Trace:
[ 99.725608][ T2] <TASK>
[ 99.726646][ T2] get_page_from_freelist+0x6fe/0x14b0
[ 99.728583][ T2] ? fs_reclaim_acquire+0x43/0xe0
[ 99.730325][ T2] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
[ 99.731965][ T2] __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x147/0x2d0
[ 99.734003][ T2] __alloc_pages_noprof+0x5/0x50
[ 99.735766][ T2] copy_process+0x1b1/0x1b30
[ 99.737398][ T2] ? lock_is_held_type+0x89/0x100
[ 99.739157][ T2] ? kthreadd+0x25/0x190
[ 99.740664][ T2] kernel_clone+0x59/0x390
[ 99.742213][ T2] ? kthreadd+0x25/0x190
[ 99.743728][ T2] kernel_thread+0x55/0x70
[ 99.745310][ T2] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
[ 99.747265][ T2] kthreadd+0x117/0x190
[ 99.748748][ T2] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0x30/0x30
[ 99.750509][ T2] ret_from_fork+0x16b/0x1e0
[ 99.752193][ T2] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0x30/0x30
[ 99.753992][ T2] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
[ 99.755717][ T2] </TASK>
[ 99.756861][ T2] CR2: ffff888012804000
[ 99.758353][ T2] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[ 99.760319][ T2] RIP: 0010:clear_page_erms+0x7/0x10
[ 99.762209][ T2] Code: 48 89 47 18 48 89 47 20 48 89 47 28 48 89 47 30 48 89 47 38 48 8d 7f 40 75 d9 90 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 b9 00 10 00 00 31 c0 <f3> aa c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 83 f9 40 73 2a 83 f9 08 73 0f 85 c9
[ 99.769129][ T2] RSP: 0018:ffff88800318fc10 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 99.771297][ T2] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000400dc0 RCX: 0000000000001000
[ 99.774126][ T2] RDX: ffffea00004a0100 RSI: ffffea00004a0200 RDI: ffff888012804000
[ 99.777013][ T2] RBP: 0000000000000801 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 99.779827][ T2] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000002
[ 99.782641][ T2] R13: 0000000000000801 R14: ffffea00004a0100 R15: ffffffff81f4df80
[ 99.785487][ T2] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880bbf28000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 99.788671][ T2] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 99.791012][ T2] CR2: ffff888012804000 CR3: 0000000007583001 CR4: 0000000000372eb0
[ 99.793863][ T2] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
[ 99.796760][ T2] Kernel Offset: disabled
[ 99.798296][ T2] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]---
This makes me suspect the kvm_gmem_folio_restore_direct_map() path isn't
working or isn't getting called.
If anyone wants help trying to reproduce this let me know.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists