[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <951587b1-0c60-4ea9-9594-b279e8a19e5c@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 09:01:53 -0800
From: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@...cle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: chuck.lever@...cle.com, jlayton@...nel.org, neilb@...mail.net,
okorniev@...hat.com, tom@...pey.com, alex.aring@...il.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] NFSD: Fix server hang when there are multiple layout
conflicts
On 11/7/25 5:29 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 09:05:26AM -0800, Dai Ngo wrote:
>> When a layout conflict triggers a call to __break_lease, the function
>> nfsd4_layout_lm_break clears the fl_break_time timeout before sending
>> the CB_LAYOUTRECALL. As a result, __break_lease repeatedly restarts
>> its loop, waiting indefinitely for the conflicting file lease to be
>> released.
>>
>> If the number of lease conflicts matches the number of NFSD threads
>> (which defaults to 8), all available NFSD threads become occupied.
>> Consequently, there are no threads left to handle incoming requests
>> or callback replies, leading to a total hang of the NFS server.
>>
>> This issue is reliably reproducible by running the Git test suite
>> on a configuration using SCSI layout.
>>
>> This patch addresses the problem by using the break lease timeout
>> and ensures that the unresponsive client is fenced, preventing it from
>> accessing the data server directly.
>>
>> Fixes: f99d4fbdae67 ("nfsd: add SCSI layout support")
>> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c
>> index 683bd1130afe..b9b1eb32624c 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c
>> @@ -747,11 +747,10 @@ static bool
>> nfsd4_layout_lm_break(struct file_lease *fl)
>> {
>> /*
>> - * We don't want the locks code to timeout the lease for us;
>> - * we'll remove it ourself if a layout isn't returned
>> - * in time:
>> + * Enforce break lease timeout to prevent starvation of
>> + * NFSD threads in __break_lease that causes server to
>> + * hang.
>> */
>> - fl->fl_break_time = 0;
>> nfsd4_recall_file_layout(fl->c.flc_owner);
>> return false;
>> }
>> @@ -764,9 +763,27 @@ nfsd4_layout_lm_change(struct file_lease *onlist, int arg,
>> return lease_modify(onlist, arg, dispose);
>> }
>>
>> +static void nfsd_layout_breaker_timedout(struct file_lease *fl)
>> +{
>> + struct nfs4_layout_stateid *ls = fl->c.flc_owner;
>> + struct nfsd_file *nf;
>> +
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + nf = nfsd_file_get(ls->ls_file);
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> + if (nf) {
> Just a little note on the existing infrastructure (and not this change
> that uses it)h ere: I wish this would be nfsd_file_tryget and the
> RCU locking was hidden in the helper. At least some users seems to
> miss the RCU protection or rely on undocumented locks making it
> not required (maybe?).
Make sense, maybe for another day.
>
>> + int type = ls->ls_layout_type;
> ls_layout_type is a u32, so please use the same type.
will fix.
>
> Otherwise this looks good to me.
Thanks,
-Dai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists