[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gs4xVKv65NW8A7XPgAqwoM6B-izAFrkySjmgeoNqDirg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 18:49:35 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sudeep.Holla@....com, linuxarm@...wei.com,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, zhanjie9@...ilicon.com, zhenglifeng1@...wei.com,
yubowen8@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: processor: idle: Remove useless codes about the
verification of cstate count
On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 10:36 AM Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> The acpi_processor_setup_cstates and acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_cx will
> be called after successfully obtaining the power information. These setup
> functions have their own main role, but also verify the validity of cstate
> count.
>
> Actually, the acpi_processor_get_power_info_cst will return failure if the
> cstate count is zero and acpi_processor_get_power_info will return failure.
>
> So the verification of cstate count in these functions are useless.
>
> No intentional functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 22 +++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> index 341825e8ac63..22909fccf0b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> @@ -732,8 +732,8 @@ static int __cpuidle acpi_idle_enter_s2idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_cx(struct acpi_processor *pr,
> - struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> +static void acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_cx(struct acpi_processor *pr,
> + struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> {
> int i, count = ACPI_IDLE_STATE_START;
> struct acpi_processor_cx *cx;
> @@ -753,14 +753,9 @@ static int acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_cx(struct acpi_processor *pr,
> if (count == CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX)
> break;
> }
> -
> - if (!count)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - return 0;
> }
>
> -static int acpi_processor_setup_cstates(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> +static void acpi_processor_setup_cstates(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> {
> int i, count;
> struct acpi_processor_cx *cx;
> @@ -822,11 +817,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_setup_cstates(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> }
>
> drv->state_count = count;
> -
> - if (!count)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - return 0;
> }
>
> static inline void acpi_processor_cstate_first_run_checks(void)
> @@ -1241,7 +1231,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_states(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> if (pr->flags.has_lpi)
> return acpi_processor_setup_lpi_states(pr);
>
> - return acpi_processor_setup_cstates(pr);
> + acpi_processor_setup_cstates(pr);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1261,7 +1252,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_dev(struct acpi_processor *pr,
> if (pr->flags.has_lpi)
> return acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(pr->id);
>
> - return acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_cx(pr, dev);
> + acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_cx(pr, dev);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int acpi_processor_get_power_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> --
Applied as 6.19 material with rewritten subject and changelog, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists