linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] ACPI: CPPC: Fixes to limit actions to online CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aQ14z1P0I3WLYnEi@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 10:12:55 +0530
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>
To: "Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)" <superm1@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christopher Harris <chris.harris79@...il.com>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ACPI: CPPC: Fixes to limit actions to online CPUs

On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 10:00:25AM -0600, Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org) wrote:
> 
> > 
> 
> The series looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@...nel.org>

Thank you!

> 
> But I would say I noticed we are also using for_each_present_cpu() in
> amd-pstate with amd_pstate_change_mode_without_dvr_change().
> 
> Should that also get a similar change?

Good catch! Yes, that too needs to be fixed to for_each_online_cpu().

I will spin a v2 to include that patch and pick up your Reviewed-by
tag for the earlier ones, and also Chris's Tested-by tag for the first
two patches.

-- 
Thanks and Regards
gautham.