linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: svc: Add IOMMU support for Agilex5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <14b69e02-106f-4f9c-a43e-16218b07f3a8@altera.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 07:49:00 +0000
From: "Romli, Khairul Anuar" <khairul.anuar.romli@...era.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	"Rao, Mahesh" <mahesh.rao@...era.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: svc: Add IOMMU support for
 Agilex5

On 7/11/2025 3:35 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 07:35:25AM +0800, Khairul Anuar Romli wrote:
>> In Agilex5, the TBU (Translation Buffer Unit) can now operate in non-secure
>> mode, enabling Linux to utilize it through the IOMMU framework. This allows
>> improved memory management capabilities in non-secure environments. With
>> Agilex5 lifting this restriction, we are now extending the device tree
>> bindings to support IOMMU for the Agilex5 SVC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Khairul Anuar Romli <khairul.anuar.romli@...era.com>
>> ---
>
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
> patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
> bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
> on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
> need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
> will do that for tags received on the version they apply.
>
> Please read:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> </form letter>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

The reviewed-by tag was not added on purpose because I re-added the
"allOf" and add indentations to the rest of the of logical block versus
the previous version.

Thanks.

Regards,
Khairul