[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab520621-b11d-4763-a7b7-fe7dfafdca6c@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 09:12:48 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] dt-bindings: clock: airoha: Document support for
AN7583 clock
On 07/11/2025 08:45, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 08:42:15AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 08:59:31PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
>>> Document support for Airoha AN7583 clock based on the EN7523
>>> clock schema.
>>>
>>> Add additional binding for additional clock and reset lines.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/clock/airoha,en7523-scu.yaml | 5 +-
>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h | 3 +
>>> .../dt-bindings/reset/airoha,an7583-reset.h | 62 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/airoha,an7583-reset.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/airoha,en7523-scu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/airoha,en7523-scu.yaml
>>> index fe2c5c1baf43..2d53b96356c5 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/airoha,en7523-scu.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/airoha,en7523-scu.yaml
>>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ properties:
>>> compatible:
>>> items:
>>> - enum:
>>> + - airoha,an7583-scu
>>
>> That's random order. Keep it sorted.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> I was also not cetrain on the correct order.
Why? The rule was expressed on mailing list many, many times and only
Sunxi or maybe one more SoC does it differently.
>
> We have En7523 and en7581 and then An7583.
>
> So should I put it at last following the number order or the
> alphabetical order?
All such lists or enumerations are ordered alphanumerically.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists