linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tun: use skb_attempt_defer_free in tun_do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7D7750CA-4637-4D4A-970C-CB1260E3ADBC@akamai.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 09:15:54 +0000
From: "Hudson, Nick" <nhudson@...mai.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn
	<willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: use skb_attempt_defer_free in tun_do_read



> On 7 Nov 2025, at 09:11, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> 
> !-------------------------------------------------------------------|
>  This Message Is From an External Sender
>  This message came from outside your organization.
> |-------------------------------------------------------------------!
> 
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 12:41 AM Hudson, Nick <nhudson@...mai.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 7 Nov 2025, at 02:21, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> !-------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>> This Message Is From an External Sender
>>> This message came from outside your organization.
>>> |-------------------------------------------------------------------!
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2025 at 11:51 PM Nick Hudson <nhudson@...mai.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On a 640 CPU system running virtio-net VMs with the vhost-net driver, and
>>>> multiqueue (64) tap devices testing has shown contention on the zone lock
>>>> of the page allocator.
>>>> 
>>>> A 'perf record -F99 -g sleep 5' of the CPUs where the vhost worker threads run shows
>>>> 
>>>>   # perf report -i perf.data.vhost --stdio --sort overhead  --no-children | head -22
>>>>   ...
>>>>   #
>>>>      100.00%
>>>>               |
>>>>               |--9.47%--queued_spin_lock_slowpath
>>>>               |          |
>>>>               |           --9.37%--_raw_spin_lock_irqsave
>>>>               |                     |
>>>>               |                     |--5.00%--__rmqueue_pcplist
>>>>               |                     |          get_page_from_freelist
>>>>               |                     |          __alloc_pages_noprof
>>>>               |                     |          |
>>>>               |                     |          |--3.34%--napi_alloc_skb
>>>>   #
>>>> 
>>>> That is, for Rx packets
>>>> - ksoftirqd threads pinned 1:1 to CPUs do SKB allocation.
>>>> - vhost-net threads float across CPUs do SKB free.
>>>> 
>>>> One method to avoid this contention is to free SKB allocations on the same
>>>> CPU as they were allocated on. This allows freed pages to be placed on the
>>>> per-cpu page (PCP) lists so that any new allocations can be taken directly
>>>> from the PCP list rather than having to request new pages from the page
>>>> allocator (and taking the zone lock).
>>>> 
>>>> Fortunately, previous work has provided all the infrastructure to do this
>>>> via the skb_attempt_defer_free call which this change uses instead of
>>>> consume_skb in tun_do_read.
>>>> 
>>>> Testing done with a 6.12 based kernel and the patch ported forward.
>>>> 
>>>> Server is Dual Socket AMD SP5 - 2x AMD SP5 9845 (Turin) with 2 VMs
>>>> Load generator: iPerf2 x 1200 clients MSS=400
>>>> 
>>>> Before:
>>>> Maximum traffic rate: 55Gbps
>>>> 
>>>> After:
>>>> Maximum traffic rate 110Gbps
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/tun.c | 2 +-
>>>> net/core/skbuff.c | 2 ++
>>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
>>>> index 8192740357a0..388f3ffc6657 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
>>>> @@ -2185,7 +2185,7 @@ static ssize_t tun_do_read(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
>>>>               if (unlikely(ret < 0))
>>>>                       kfree_skb(skb);
>>>>               else
>>>> -                       consume_skb(skb);
>>>> +                       skb_attempt_defer_free(skb);
>>>>       }
>>>> 
>>>>       return ret;
>>>> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
>>>> index 6be01454f262..89217c43c639 100644
>>>> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
>>>> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
>>>> @@ -7201,6 +7201,7 @@ nodefer:  kfree_skb_napi_cache(skb);
>>>>       DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(skb_dst(skb));
>>>>       DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(skb->destructor);
>>>>       DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(skb_nfct(skb));
>>>> +       DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(skb_shared(skb));
>>> 
>>> I may miss something but it looks there's no guarantee that the packet
>>> sent to TAP is not shared.
>> 
>> Yes, I did wonder.
>> 
>> How about something like
>> 
>> /**
>> * consume_skb_attempt_defer - free an skbuff
>> * @skb: buffer to free
>> *
>> * Drop a ref to the buffer and attempt to defer free it if the usage count
>> * has hit zero.
>> */
>> void consume_skb_attempt_defer(struct sk_buff *skb)
>> {
>> if (!skb_unref(skb))
>> return;
>> 
>> trace_consume_skb(skb, __builtin_return_address(0));
>> 
>> skb_attempt_defer_free(skb);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(consume_skb_attempt_defer);
>> 
>> and an inline version for the !CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS case
> 
> I will take care of the changes, have you seen my recent series ?

Great, thanks. I did see your series and will evaluate the improvement in our test setup.

> 
> 
> I think you are missing a few points….

Sure, still learning.



Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (3067 bytes)