lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALPaoCg7ZeQOgkeaPQ6ERKtaJqQ_n3xQUrK=qxi01CnuTjL4PA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 11:30:00 +0100
From: Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>
To: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, 
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>, carl@...amperecomputing.com, 
	lcherian@...vell.com, bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com, 
	baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, 
	Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, dfustini@...libre.com, amitsinght@...vell.com, 
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>, Koba Ko <kobak@...dia.com>, 
	Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>, fenghuay@...dia.com, baisheng.gao@...soc.com, 
	Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@....com>, Rafael Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, 
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, 
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, 
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>, Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 26/29] arm_mpam: Use long MBWU counters if supported

Hi Ben

On Thu, Nov 6, 2025 at 5:41 PM Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 11/6/25 16:15, Peter Newman wrote:
> > Hi Ben (and James),
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 8:59 PM James Morse <james.morse@....com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@....com>
> >>
> >> Now that the larger counter sizes are probed, make use of them.
> >>
> >> Callers of mpam_msmon_read() may not know (or care!) about the different
> >> counter sizes. Allow them to specify mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu and have the
> >> driver pick the counter to use.
> >>
> >> Only 32bit accesses to the MSC are required to be supported by the
> >> spec, but these registers are 64bits. The lower half may overflow
> >> into the higher half between two 32bit reads. To avoid this, use
> >> a helper that reads the top half multiple times to check for overflow.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@....com>
> >> [morse: merged multiple patches from Rohit, added explicit counter selection ]
> >> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>
> >> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>
> >> ---
> >> Changes since v2:
> >>  * Removed mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu as a top-level bit for explicit 31bit counter
> >>    selection.
> >>  * Allow callers of mpam_msmon_read() to specify mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu and have
> >>    the driver pick a supported counter size.
> >>  * Rephrased commit message.
> >>
> >> Changes since v1:
> >>  * Only clear OFLOW_STATUS_L on MBWU counters.
> >>
> >> Changes since RFC:
> >>  * Commit message wrangling.
> >>  * Refer to 31 bit counters as opposed to 32 bit (registers).
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >>  1 file changed, 116 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> >> index f4d07234ce10..c207a6d2832c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> >> @@ -897,6 +897,48 @@ struct mon_read {
> >>         int                             err;
> >>  };
> >>
> >> +static bool mpam_ris_has_mbwu_long_counter(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
> >> +{
> >> +       return (mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_63counter, &ris->props) ||
> >> +               mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_44counter, &ris->props));
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static u64 mpam_msc_read_mbwu_l(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> >> +{
> >> +       int retry = 3;
> >> +       u32 mbwu_l_low;
> >> +       u64 mbwu_l_high1, mbwu_l_high2;
> >> +
> >> +       mpam_mon_sel_lock_held(msc);
> >> +
> >> +       WARN_ON_ONCE((MSMON_MBWU_L + sizeof(u64)) > msc->mapped_hwpage_sz);
> >> +       WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &msc->accessibility));
> >> +
> >> +       mbwu_l_high2 = __mpam_read_reg(msc, MSMON_MBWU_L + 4);
> >> +       do {
> >> +               mbwu_l_high1 = mbwu_l_high2;
> >> +               mbwu_l_low = __mpam_read_reg(msc, MSMON_MBWU_L);
> >> +               mbwu_l_high2 = __mpam_read_reg(msc, MSMON_MBWU_L + 4);
> >> +
> >> +               retry--;
> >> +       } while (mbwu_l_high1 != mbwu_l_high2 && retry > 0);
> >> +
> >> +       if (mbwu_l_high1 == mbwu_l_high2)
> >> +               return (mbwu_l_high1 << 32) | mbwu_l_low;
> >> +       return MSMON___NRDY_L;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void mpam_msc_zero_mbwu_l(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> >> +{
> >> +       mpam_mon_sel_lock_held(msc);
> >> +
> >> +       WARN_ON_ONCE((MSMON_MBWU_L + sizeof(u64)) > msc->mapped_hwpage_sz);
> >> +       WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &msc->accessibility));
> >> +
> >> +       __mpam_write_reg(msc, MSMON_MBWU_L, 0);
> >> +       __mpam_write_reg(msc, MSMON_MBWU_L + 4, 0);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  static void gen_msmon_ctl_flt_vals(struct mon_read *m, u32 *ctl_val,
> >>                                    u32 *flt_val)
> >>  {
> >> @@ -924,7 +966,9 @@ static void gen_msmon_ctl_flt_vals(struct mon_read *m, u32 *ctl_val,
> >>                                                ctx->csu_exclude_clean);
> >>
> >>                 break;
> >> -       case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu:
> >> +       case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_31counter:
> >> +       case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_44counter:
> >> +       case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_63counter:
> >>                 *ctl_val |= MSMON_CFG_MBWU_CTL_TYPE_MBWU;
> >>
> >>                 if (mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_rwbw, &m->ris->props))
> >> @@ -946,7 +990,9 @@ static void read_msmon_ctl_flt_vals(struct mon_read *m, u32 *ctl_val,
> >>                 *ctl_val = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_CSU_CTL);
> >>                 *flt_val = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_CSU_FLT);
> >>                 return;
> >> -       case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu:
> >> +       case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_31counter:
> >> +       case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_44counter:
> >> +       case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_63counter:
> >>                 *ctl_val = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_CTL);
> >>                 *flt_val = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_FLT);
> >>                 return;
> >> @@ -959,6 +1005,9 @@ static void read_msmon_ctl_flt_vals(struct mon_read *m, u32 *ctl_val,
> >>  static void clean_msmon_ctl_val(u32 *cur_ctl)
> >>  {
> >>         *cur_ctl &= ~MSMON_CFG_x_CTL_OFLOW_STATUS;
> >> +
> >> +       if (FIELD_GET(MSMON_CFG_x_CTL_TYPE, *cur_ctl) == MSMON_CFG_MBWU_CTL_TYPE_MBWU)
> >> +               *cur_ctl &= ~MSMON_CFG_MBWU_CTL_OFLOW_STATUS_L;
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  static void write_msmon_ctl_flt_vals(struct mon_read *m, u32 ctl_val,
> >> @@ -978,10 +1027,15 @@ static void write_msmon_ctl_flt_vals(struct mon_read *m, u32 ctl_val,
> >>                 mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CSU, 0);
> >>                 mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_CSU_CTL, ctl_val | MSMON_CFG_x_CTL_EN);
> >>                 break;
> >> -       case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu:
> >> +       case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_44counter:
> >> +       case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_63counter:
> >> +               mpam_msc_zero_mbwu_l(m->ris->vmsc->msc);
> >> +               fallthrough;
> >> +       case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_31counter:
> >>                 mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_FLT, flt_val);
> >>                 mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_CTL, ctl_val);
> >>                 mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, MBWU, 0);
> >
> > The fallthrough above seems to be problematic, assuming the MBWU=0
> > being last for 31-bit was intentional. For long counters, this is
> > zeroing the counter before updating the filter/control registers, but
> > then clearing the 32-bit version of the counter. This fails to clear
> > the NRDY bit on the long counter, which isn't cleared by software
> > anywhere else.
> >
> > From section 10.3.2 from the MPAM spec shared:
> >
> >  "On a counting monitor, the NRDY bit remains set until it is reset by
> > software writing it as 0 in the monitor register, or automatically
> > after the monitor is captured in the capture register by a capture
> > event"
> >
> > If I update the 63-bit case to call
> > mpam_msc_zero_mbwu_l(m->ris->vmsc->msc) after updating the
> > control/filter registers (in addition to the other items I pointed in
> > my last reply), I'm able to read MBWU counts from my hardware through
> > mbm_total_bytes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Peter
>
> Thanks for the testing and flagging the problem. We should do the
> configuration in the same order for all the monitors.
>
> I'll change the case to:
>
>         case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_31counter:
>         case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_44counter:
>         case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_63counter:
>                 mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_FLT, flt_val);
>                 mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_CTL, ctl_val);
>
>                 if (m->type == mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_31counter)
>                         mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, MBWU, 0);
>                 else
>                         mpam_msc_zero_mbwu_l(m->ris->vmsc->msc);
>
>                 mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_CTL, ctl_val | MSMON_CFG_x_CTL_EN);
>                 break;

I tried this out but wasn't able to read the counters. I needed to
move the MBWU[_L] write to the end. Writing the registers directly on
the hardware I'm testing with, I confirmed that just flipping
MBWU_CTL.EN sets NRDY:

MBWU_L=0x880
MBWU_CTL=0x828

 / # mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_CTL))
0x80030042
 / # mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L)); mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L + 4))
0x03ecb2c0
0x00000000
 / # mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L)); mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L + 4))
0x03f70580
0x00000000

Clear MBWU_CTL.EN:

 / # mmio_write32 $((msc + MBWU_CTL)) 0x00030042
 / # mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L)); mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L + 4))
0x05004680
0x80000000
 / # mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L)); mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L + 4))
0x05004680
0x80000000

Clear NRDY and reenable MBWU_CTL.EN:

 / # mmio_write32 $((msc + MBWU_L)) 0; mmio_write32 $((msc + MBWU_L + 4)) 0
 / # mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L)); mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L + 4))
0x00000000
0x00000000
 / # mmio_write32 $((msc + MBWU_CTL)) 0x80030042
 / # mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L)); mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L + 4))
0x001dee80
0x80000000

In fact, re-writing the same value back into MBWU_CTL.EN also sets NRDY:

 / # mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L)); mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L + 4))
0x00253e00
0x00000000
 / # mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L)); mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L + 4))
0x00b1a6c0
0x00000000
 / # mmio_write32 $((msc + MBWU_CTL)) 0x80030042
 / # mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L)); mmio_read32 $((msc + MBWU_L + 4))
0x018d1d40
0x80000000

Thanks,
-Peter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ