lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251107113442.e2qxn6ifmo2rprus@hu-mojha-hyd.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 17:04:42 +0530
From: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@....qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/14] remoteproc: pas: Extend parse_fw callback to
 fetch resources via SMC call

On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 11:47:02AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 11/4/25 8:35 AM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> > Qualcomm remote processor may rely on static and dynamic resources for
> > it to be functional. For most of the Qualcomm SoCs, when run with Gunyah
> > or older QHEE hypervisor, all the resources whether it is static or
> > dynamic, is managed by the hypervisor. Dynamic resources if it is
> > present for a remote processor will always be coming from secure world
> > via SMC call while static resources may be present in remote processor
> > firmware binary or it may be coming from SMC call along with dynamic
> > resources.
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Qualcomm remote processor may rely on static and dynamic resources for
> > +	 * it to be functional. For most of the Qualcomm SoCs, when run with Gunyah
> > +	 * or older QHEE hypervisor, all the resources whether it is static or dynamic,
> > +	 * is managed by present hypervisor. Dynamic resources if it is present for
> > +	 * a remote processor will always be coming from secure world via SMC call
> > +	 * while static resources may be present in remote processor firmware binary
> > +	 * or it may be coming from SMC call along with dynamic resources.
> 
> How about:
> 
> """
> The resources consumed by Qualcomm remote processors fall into two categories:
> static (such as the memory carveouts for the rproc firmware) and dynamic (like
> shared memory pools).
> 
> Both are managed by a Qualcomm hypervisor (such as QHEE or Gunyah), if one is
> present.
> 
> Otherwise, a resource table must be retrieved via an SCM call. That table will
> list all dynamic resources (if any) and possibly the static ones.
> The static resources may also come from a resource table embedded in the rproc
> firmware instead.
> """
> 
> ?

Concise, thanks for the effort.

> 
> > +	 *
> > +	 * Here, we call rproc_elf_load_rsc_table() to check firmware binary has resources
> > +	 * or not and if it is not having then we pass NULL and zero as input resource
> > +	 * table pointer and size respectively to the argument of qcom_scm_pas_get_rsc_table()
> > +	 * and this is even true for Qualcomm remote processor who does follow remoteproc
> > +	 * framework.
> > +	 */
> > +	ret = qcom_scm_pas_get_rsc_table(pas->pas_ctx, table, table_sz, &output_rt,
> > +					 &output_rt_size);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(pas->dev, "Error in getting resource table: %d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
> 
> Would this not simply discard the firmware binary table in the "split case"?
> 

For split case, it will have resource table from remote processor firmware,
which we are passing as part of qcom_scm_pas_get_rsc_table(), TZ firmware
will append dynamic one after authentication the static one and will copy
the final table in output_rt and its total size in output_rt_size.

> Konrad
> 
> > +	rproc->cached_table = output_rt;
> > +	rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table;
> > +	rproc->table_sz = output_rt_size;
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static unsigned long qcom_pas_panic(struct rproc *rproc)
> >  {
> >  	struct qcom_pas *pas = rproc->priv;
> > @@ -425,7 +481,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops qcom_pas_ops = {
> >  	.start = qcom_pas_start,
> >  	.stop = qcom_pas_stop,
> >  	.da_to_va = qcom_pas_da_to_va,
> > -	.parse_fw = qcom_register_dump_segments,
> > +	.parse_fw = qcom_pas_parse_firmware,
> >  	.load = qcom_pas_load,
> >  	.panic = qcom_pas_panic,
> >  };
> > @@ -435,7 +491,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops qcom_pas_minidump_ops = {
> >  	.start = qcom_pas_start,
> >  	.stop = qcom_pas_stop,
> >  	.da_to_va = qcom_pas_da_to_va,
> > -	.parse_fw = qcom_register_dump_segments,
> > +	.parse_fw = qcom_pas_parse_firmware,
> >  	.load = qcom_pas_load,
> >  	.panic = qcom_pas_panic,
> >  	.coredump = qcom_pas_minidump,
> > 

-- 
-Mukesh Ojha

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ