[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQ3hfHOTCPb6gxyF@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 13:09:32 +0100
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove bogus static/inline specifiers
On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 04:03:16PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>
> The recent io_remap_pfn_range() rework applied the static and inline
> specifiers to the implementation of io_remap_pfn_range_pfn() on MIPS
> Alchemy, mirroring the same change on other platforms. However, this
> function is defined in a source file and that definition causes a
> conflict with its declaration. Fix this by dropping the specifiers.
>
> Fixes: 8efb51ad1b05 ("mm: abstract io_remap_pfn_range() based on PFN")
I guess this patch should be applied to the tree, where this commit
is in.
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists