[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQ1OCBo87ZkIJng9@harry>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 10:40:24 +0900
From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
To: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@...ux.dev>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, hughd@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, david@...hat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
ziy@...dia.com, imran.f.khan@...cle.com, kamalesh.babulal@...cle.com,
axelrasmussen@...gle.com, yuanchu@...gle.com, weixugc@...gle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/26] mm: memcontrol: remove dead code of checking
parent memory cgroup
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 09:58:14PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
>
> Since the no-hierarchy mode has been deprecated after the commit:
>
> commit bef8620cd8e0 ("mm: memcg: deprecate the non-hierarchical mode").
>
> As a result, parent_mem_cgroup() will not return NULL except when passing
> the root memcg, and the root memcg cannot be offline. Hence, it's safe to
> remove the check on the returned value of parent_mem_cgroup(). Remove the
> corresponding dead code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
> ---
Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists