[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQ1TiuTL5ZQ_4JIX@harry>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 11:03:54 +0900
From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
To: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@...ux.dev>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, hughd@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, david@...hat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
ziy@...dia.com, imran.f.khan@...cle.com, kamalesh.babulal@...cle.com,
axelrasmussen@...gle.com, yuanchu@...gle.com, weixugc@...gle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/26] mm: rename unlock_page_lruvec_irq and its
variants
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 09:58:16PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
>
> It is inappropriate to use folio_lruvec_lock() variants in conjunction
> with unlock_page_lruvec() variants, as this involves the inconsistent
> operation of locking a folio while unlocking a page. To rectify this, the
> functions unlock_page_lruvec{_irq, _irqrestore} are renamed to
> lruvec_unlock{_irq,_irqrestore}.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
> ---
Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists