linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] Support power resources defined in acpi on ata

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aQ-ll__G8ZXyGtx2@ryzen>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2025 21:18:31 +0100
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Markus Probst <markus.probst@...teo.de>,
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] Support power resources defined in acpi on ata

On Sat, Nov 08, 2025 at 01:28:23PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Niklas,
> 
> > If you have no comments, is it okay to take this via the libata tree,
> > or do you prefer to merge the series via the scsi tree?
> 
> It all seemed pretty straightforward and given Damien's reviews I
> applied this to SCSI. If that creates any merge conflicts for you, let
> me know...

Thank you Martin!

The changes are very self-contained, and essentially only touches
drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c, so I do not expect any merge conflicts.


Kind regards,
Niklas