[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aRCG3OUThPCys92r@fedora>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2025 20:19:40 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] loop: use blk_rq_nr_phys_segments() instead of
iterating bvecs
On Sat, Nov 08, 2025 at 04:01:00PM -0700, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> The number of bvecs can be obtained directly from struct request's
> nr_phys_segments field via blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(), so use that
> instead of iterating over the bvecs an extra time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/loop.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index 13ce229d450c..8096478fad45 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -346,16 +346,13 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
> struct request *rq = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(cmd);
> struct bio *bio = rq->bio;
> struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
> struct bio_vec tmp;
> unsigned int offset;
> - int nr_bvec = 0;
> + unsigned short nr_bvec = blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(rq);
> int ret;
>
> - rq_for_each_bvec(tmp, rq, rq_iter)
> - nr_bvec++;
> -
The two may not be same, since one bvec can be splitted into multiple segments.
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists