[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251109024013.fzt7xxpmxwi75xgr@master>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2025 02:40:13 +0000
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
To: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, david@...hat.com,
ziy@...dia.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
ryan.roberts@....com, dev.jain@....com, corbet@....net,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
baohua@...nel.org, willy@...radead.org, peterx@...hat.com,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, usamaarif642@...il.com,
sunnanyong@...wei.com, vishal.moola@...il.com,
thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com, yang@...amperecomputing.com,
kas@...nel.org, aarcange@...hat.com, raquini@...hat.com,
anshuman.khandual@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, tiwai@...e.de,
will@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, jack@...e.cz,
cl@...two.org, jglisse@...gle.com, surenb@...gle.com,
zokeefe@...gle.com, hannes@...xchg.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
mhocko@...e.com, rdunlap@...radead.org, hughd@...gle.com,
richard.weiyang@...il.com, lance.yang@...ux.dev, vbabka@...e.cz,
rppt@...nel.org, jannh@...gle.com, pfalcato@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 mm-new 13/15] khugepaged: avoid unnecessary mTHP
collapse attempts
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 12:37:15PM -0600, Nico Pache wrote:
>There are cases where, if an attempted collapse fails, all subsequent
>orders are guaranteed to also fail. Avoid these collapse attempts by
>bailing out early.
>
>Signed-off-by: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
>---
> mm/khugepaged.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>index e2319bfd0065..54f5c7888e46 100644
>--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>@@ -1431,10 +1431,39 @@ static int collapse_scan_bitmap(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
> ret = collapse_huge_page(mm, address, referenced,
> unmapped, cc, mmap_locked,
> order, offset);
>- if (ret == SCAN_SUCCEED) {
>+
>+ /*
>+ * Analyze failure reason to determine next action:
>+ * - goto next_order: try smaller orders in same region
>+ * - continue: try other regions at same order
>+ * - break: stop all attempts (system-wide failure)
>+ */
>+ switch (ret) {
>+ /* Cases were we should continue to the next region */
>+ case SCAN_SUCCEED:
> collapsed += 1UL << order;
>+ fallthrough;
>+ case SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE:
> continue;
>+ /* Cases were lower orders might still succeed */
>+ case SCAN_LACK_REFERENCED_PAGE:
>+ case SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE:
>+ case SCAN_EXCEED_SWAP_PTE:
>+ case SCAN_EXCEED_SHARED_PTE:
>+ case SCAN_PAGE_LOCK:
>+ case SCAN_PAGE_COUNT:
>+ case SCAN_PAGE_LRU:
>+ case SCAN_PAGE_NULL:
>+ case SCAN_DEL_PAGE_LRU:
>+ case SCAN_PTE_NON_PRESENT:
>+ case SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP:
>+ case SCAN_ALLOC_HUGE_PAGE_FAIL:
>+ goto next_order;
>+ /* All other cases should stop collapse attempts */
>+ default:
>+ break;
> }
>+ break;
One question here:
Suppose we have iterated several orders and not collapse successfully yet. So
the mthp_bitmap_stack[] would look like this:
[8 7 6 6]
^
|
Now we found this one pass the threshold check, but it fails with other
result.
Current code looks it would give up at all, but we may still have a chance to
collapse the above 3 range?
> }
>
> next_order:
>--
>2.51.0
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
Powered by blists - more mailing lists