[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a726fac9-afe5-4639-b06a-4bccc256d98f@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2025 18:37:26 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Diederik de Haas <diederik@...ow-tech.com>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Cc: hrdl <git@...l.eu>, phantomas <phantomas@...ntomas.xyz>,
Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Simplify usb-c-connector port
on rk3566-pinenote
On 09/11/2025 18:05, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> The USB-C connector on the PineNote has only 1 port, so there's no need
> for a 'ports' node with address-/size-cells properties as a single
> 'port' node suffices.
>
> This fixes the following DT validation issue:
>
> Warning (graph_child_address): /i2c@...c0000/tcpc@...connector/ports:
> graph node has single child node 'port@0',
> #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary
This is not a DT validation, but DTC warning which we do not really fix.
Are you sure the 'port' is accepted by bindings?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists