[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5024969.GXAFRqVoOG@diego>
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 23:16:22 +0100
From: Heiko StĂĽbner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Diederik de Haas <diederik@...ow-tech.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: hrdl <git@...l.eu>, phantomas <phantomas@...ntomas.xyz>,
Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:
Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Simplify usb-c-connector port on
rk3566-pinenote
Am Sonntag, 9. November 2025, 18:37:26 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 09/11/2025 18:05, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > The USB-C connector on the PineNote has only 1 port, so there's no need
> > for a 'ports' node with address-/size-cells properties as a single
> > 'port' node suffices.
> >
> > This fixes the following DT validation issue:
> >
> > Warning (graph_child_address): /i2c@...c0000/tcpc@...connector/ports:
> > graph node has single child node 'port@0',
> > #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary
>
> This is not a DT validation, but DTC warning which we do not really fix.
That is good to know. Is the same true for other dtc warnings?
Thanks
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists