lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251109083715.24495-1-qq570070308@gmail.com>
Date: Sun,  9 Nov 2025 16:37:15 +0800
From: Xie Yuanbin <qq570070308@...il.com>
To: nathan@...nel.org,
	nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com,
	morbo@...gle.com,
	justinstitt@...gle.com,
	qq570070308@...il.com,
	masahiroy@...nel.org,
	jack@...e.cz,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	maninder1.s@...sung.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
	will@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix redundant judgment in WARN_ONCE with clang

For c code:
```c
extern int xx;
void test(void)
{
	if (WARN_ONCE(xx, "x"))
		__asm__ volatile ("nop":::);
}
```

Clang will generate the following assembly code:
```assemble
test:
	movl	xx(%rip), %eax // Assume xx == 0 (likely case)
	testl	%eax, %eax // judge once
	je	.LBB0_3    // jump to .LBB0_3
	testb	$1, test.__already_done(%rip)
	je	.LBB0_2
.LBB0_3:
	testl	%eax, %eax // judge again
	je	.LBB0_5    // jump to .LBB0_5
.LBB0_4:
	nop
.LBB0_5:
	retq
	// omit
```

In the above code, `xx == 0` should be a likely case, but in this case,
xx has been judged twice.

Test info:
1. kernel source:
linux-next
commit 9c0826a5d9aa4d52206d ("Add linux-next specific files for 20251107")
2. compiler:
clang: Debian clang version 21.1.4 (8) with
Debian LLD 21.1.4 (compatible with GNU linkers)
3. config:
base on default x86_64_defconfig, and setting:
CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETHUNK=n
CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n

Add unlikely to __ret_cond to help the compiler optimize correctly.

Signed-off-by: Xie Yuanbin <qq570070308@...il.com>
---
 include/linux/once_lite.h | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/once_lite.h b/include/linux/once_lite.h
index 27de7bc32a06..194c5ebbfbc4 100644
--- a/include/linux/once_lite.h
+++ b/include/linux/once_lite.h
@@ -10,17 +10,17 @@
 #define DO_ONCE_LITE(func, ...)						\
 	DO_ONCE_LITE_IF(true, func, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 
-#define __ONCE_LITE_IF(condition)					\
-	({								\
-		static bool __section(".data..once") __already_done;	\
-		bool __ret_cond = !!(condition);			\
-		bool __ret_once = false;				\
-									\
-		if (unlikely(__ret_cond && !__already_done)) {		\
-			__already_done = true;				\
-			__ret_once = true;				\
-		}							\
-		unlikely(__ret_once);					\
+#define __ONCE_LITE_IF(condition)						\
+	({									\
+		static bool __section(".data..once") __already_done;		\
+		bool __ret_cond = !!(condition);				\
+		bool __ret_once = false;					\
+										\
+		if (unlikely(__ret_cond) && unlikely(!__already_done)) {	\
+			__already_done = true;					\
+			__ret_once = true;					\
+		}								\
+		unlikely(__ret_once);						\
 	})
 
 #define DO_ONCE_LITE_IF(condition, func, ...)				\
-- 
2.51.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ