linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Add sm8750 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <77qbioe5jfu3pwlmsg5wve3twslurvldkw7xuo6dif5hrnu77s@rv7hgegh2ygx>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:58:33 -0600
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Sarthak Garg <sarthak.garg@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, 
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com, 
	quic_rampraka@...cinc.com, quic_pragalla@...cinc.com, quic_sayalil@...cinc.com, 
	quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com, quic_bhaskarv@...cinc.com, kernel@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Add sm8750 compatible

On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 12:17:51PM +0530, Sarthak Garg wrote:
> 
> On 10/27/2025 8:00 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 26/10/2025 12:17, Sarthak Garg wrote:
> > > Document the compatible string for the SDHCI controller on the
> > > sm8750 platform.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sarthak Garg <sarthak.garg@....qualcomm.com>
> > > Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > 
> > 
> > Why are you sending third time the same, even though this was applied
> > long time ago at v1? Please do not send unnecessary patches, this just
> > clutters people's mailboxes.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> 
> 
> I had assumed that we need to repost the entire patch series regardless of
> whether some patches were already ACKed or applied. I’ll make sure to avoid
> resending already accepted patches in future submissions to keep the mailbox
> clean.
> 

In the end maintainers are going to merge your patches onto the tip of
their branch(es).

So, if you didn't rebase your changes past the merge of this binding,
did you validate that the other changes in the series still applies? Do
they still compile? Do they still work as intended?

Regards,
Bjorn

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Sarthak
> 
>