linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [v2] Documentation: Provide guidelines for tool-generated content

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87h5v1zzib.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 08:19:24 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, Dave Hansen
 <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Dan
 Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Sasha
 Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan
 <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] Documentation: Provide guidelines for
 tool-generated content

Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> writes:

> It also seems slightly odd to produce this in advance of the maintainer's
> summit, as I felt there was some agreement that the topic should be discussed
> there?
>
> Obviously there may be very good reasons for this but it'd be good for
> them to be clarified and those who engaged in these discussions to be
> cc'd also (or at least ping on threads linking!)

The reasoning, from my point of view at least, was to have a starting
point for the Maintainers Summit discussion.  Trying to start from
scratch in Tokyo seems unlikely to get us far.

jon