[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <945fbe45-1ee7-4108-b01a-a8d2b0bb9cfe@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 16:51:27 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Mike Rapoport
<rppt@...nel.org>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] mm: add atomic VMA flags and set VM_MAYBE_GUARD as
such
On 11/7/25 17:11, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> This patch adds the ability to atomically set VMA flags with only the mmap
> read/VMA read lock held.
>
> As this could be hugely problematic for VMA flags in general given that all
> other accesses are non-atomic and serialised by the mmap/VMA locks, we
> implement this with a strict allow-list - that is, only designated flags
> are allowed to do this.
>
> We make VM_MAYBE_GUARD one of these flags.
>
> Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>
> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 2a5516bff75a..699566c21ff7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -518,6 +518,9 @@ extern unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp);
> /* This mask represents all the VMA flag bits used by mlock */
> #define VM_LOCKED_MASK (VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT)
>
> +/* These flags can be updated atomically via VMA/mmap read lock. */
> +#define VM_ATOMIC_SET_ALLOWED VM_MAYBE_GUARD
> +
> /* Arch-specific flags to clear when updating VM flags on protection change */
> #ifndef VM_ARCH_CLEAR
> # define VM_ARCH_CLEAR VM_NONE
> @@ -860,6 +863,45 @@ static inline void vm_flags_mod(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> __vm_flags_mod(vma, set, clear);
> }
>
> +static inline bool __vma_flag_atomic_valid(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + int bit)
> +{
> + const vm_flags_t mask = BIT(bit);
> +
> + /* Only specific flags are permitted */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(mask & VM_ATOMIC_SET_ALLOWED)))
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Set VMA flag atomically. Requires only VMA/mmap read lock. Only specific
> + * valid flags are allowed to do this.
> + */
> +static inline void vma_flag_set_atomic(struct vm_area_struct *vma, int bit)
> +{
> + /* mmap read lock/VMA read lock must be held. */
> + if (!rwsem_is_locked(&vma->vm_mm->mmap_lock))
> + vma_assert_locked(vma);
> +
> + if (__vma_flag_atomic_valid(vma, bit))
> + set_bit(bit, &vma->__vm_flags);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Test for VMA flag atomically. Requires no locks. Only specific valid flags
> + * are allowed to do this.
> + *
> + * This is necessarily racey, so callers must ensure that serialisation is
> + * achieved through some other means, or that races are permissible.
> + */
> +static inline bool vma_flag_test_atomic(struct vm_area_struct *vma, int bit)
> +{
> + if (__vma_flag_atomic_valid(vma, bit))
> + return test_bit(bit, &vma->__vm_flags);
> +}
Hm clang is unhappy here.
./include/linux/mm.h:932:1: error: non-void function does not return a value in all control paths [-Werror,-Wreturn-type]
932 | }
| ^
1 error generated.
I don't have CONFIG_WERROR enabled though, so not sure why it's not just a
warning, as the function is unused until patch 5/8 which adds a "return
false" here. So it's just a potential bisection annoyance with clang.
Andrew could you move that hunk from to this patch? Thanks.
> +
> static inline void vma_set_anonymous(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> vma->vm_ops = NULL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists