[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251110140048.4b2f93e0d5d93a12b030d550@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 14:00:48 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Report wrong dynamic event command
On Sun, 9 Nov 2025 21:27:50 +0800
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> Hi Masami,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on trace/for-next]
> [also build test ERROR on next-20251107]
> [cannot apply to linus/master v6.18-rc4]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Masami-Hiramatsu-Google/tracing-Report-wrong-dynamic-event-command/20251108-185823
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace for-next
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/176259938768.261465.10714633393722227911.stgit%40devnote2
> patch subject: [PATCH] tracing: Report wrong dynamic event command
> config: s390-randconfig-002-20251109 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251109/202511092149.N375MBPu-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251109/202511092149.N375MBPu-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511092149.N375MBPu-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> s390-linux-ld: kernel/trace/trace_dynevent.o: in function `create_dyn_event':
> >> kernel/trace/trace_dynevent.c:150: undefined reference to `trace_probe_log_init'
> >> s390-linux-ld: kernel/trace/trace_dynevent.c:151: undefined reference to `__trace_probe_log_err'
> >> s390-linux-ld: kernel/trace/trace_dynevent.c:152: undefined reference to `trace_probe_log_clear'
Oops, it is because CONFIG_DYNAMIC_EVENTS=y but CONFIG_PROBE_EVENTS=n.
Hmm, it seems better to make "trace_probe_log.{c,h}" for this purpose.
Thank you,
>
> Kconfig warnings: (for reference only)
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for I2C_K1
> Depends on [n]: I2C [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && (ARCH_SPACEMIT || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) && OF [=n]
> Selected by [y]:
> - MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && (ARCH_SPACEMIT || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) && I2C [=y]
>
>
> vim +150 kernel/trace/trace_dynevent.c
>
> 133
> 134 static int create_dyn_event(const char *raw_command)
> 135 {
> 136 struct dyn_event_operations *ops;
> 137 int ret = -ENODEV;
> 138
> 139 if (raw_command[0] == '-' || raw_command[0] == '!')
> 140 return dyn_event_release(raw_command, NULL);
> 141
> 142 mutex_lock(&dyn_event_ops_mutex);
> 143 list_for_each_entry(ops, &dyn_event_ops_list, list) {
> 144 ret = ops->create(raw_command);
> 145 if (!ret || ret != -ECANCELED)
> 146 break;
> 147 }
> 148 if (ret == -ECANCELED) {
> 149 /* Wrong dynamic event. Leave an error message. */
> > 150 trace_probe_log_init("dynevent", 1, &raw_command);
> > 151 trace_probe_log_err(0, BAD_DYN_EVENT);
> > 152 trace_probe_log_clear();
> 153 ret = -EINVAL;
> 154 }
> 155
> 156 mutex_unlock(&dyn_event_ops_mutex);
> 157
> 158 return ret;
> 159 }
> 160
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists