[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aRIQ9rptcggpUVft@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 06:21:10 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
Cc: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>,
Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@...il.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <etsal@...a.com>, sched-ext@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] sched_ext: Make slice values tunable and use
shorter slice in bypass mode
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 08:03:37AM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> I agree that slice_bypass_us can be a tunable in sysfs, but I think it'd be
> nicer if the default time slice would be a property of sched_ext_ops, is
> there any reason to not do that?
My thinking was that a scheduler should always be able to avoid using the
default slice. Even if we allow the default slice to be overridden by the
scheduler, it's still very crude as it will apply the same slice to all
tasks. I'm not necessarily against moving it into ops but a bit unsure how
useful it is.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists