[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mfcir56ZizXgZZpt4nQY234PA9jx3CQ24YCVQJFBQ7msA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:57:48 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] reset: rework reset-gpios handling
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 10:02 AM Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Do, 2025-11-06 at 15:32 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > NOTE: I've picked up commit e5d527be7e69 ("gpio: swnode: don't use the
> > swnode's name as the key for GPIO lookup") into my fixes branch and will
> > send it upstream by the end of this week. It will be part of v6.18-rc5
> > which tag will need to be the base for the future immutable branch
> > created by Philipp.
> >
> > Software node maintainers: if this versions is good to go, can you leave
> > your Acks under patches 1-3 and allow Philipp to take it through the
> > reset tree, provided he creates an immutable branch you can pull from
> > for v6.19?
>
> Now that -rc5 is out, could I get an Ack to create an immutable branch
> with this series on top of v6.18-rc5 (and merge it into reset/next)?
>
Hi Philipp,
I assume the Reviewed-by tags by Andy and Sakari under patches 1-3
make them good enough to go in?
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists