[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251110170332.319314-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:03:32 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] smp: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
Currently if a user enqueues a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with
the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in:
commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
Switch to using system_percpu_wq because system_wq is going away as part of
a workqueue restructuring.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- improved commit log
- rebased on 6.18-rc5
---
kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 02f52291fae4..496358eae37c 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@ int smp_call_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, int (*func)(void *), void *par, bool phys)
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(cpu))
return -ENXIO;
- queue_work_on(cpu, system_wq, &sscs.work);
+ queue_work_on(cpu, system_percpu_wq, &sscs.work);
wait_for_completion(&sscs.done);
destroy_work_on_stack(&sscs.work);
--
2.51.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists