[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aRJwPMPsvMfxSj1u@krikkit>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:07:40 +0100
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To: Zilin Guan <zilin@....edu.cn>
Cc: steffen.klassert@...unet.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jianhao.xu@....edu.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfrm: fix memory leak in xfrm_add_acquire()
note: the subject prefix should be [PATCH ipsec vX] for fixes to the
ipsec tree. (sorry, I forgot to mention that in v1)
2025-11-10, 06:41:25 +0000, Zilin Guan wrote:
> The xfrm_add_acquire() function constructs an xfrm policy by calling
> xfrm_policy_construct(). This allocates the policy structure and
> potentially associates a security context and a device policy with it.
>
> However, at the end of the function, the policy object is freed using
> only kfree() . This skips the necessary cleanup for the security context
> and device policy, leading to a memory leak.
>
> To fix this, invoke the proper cleanup functions xfrm_dev_policy_delete(),
> xfrm_dev_policy_free(), and security_xfrm_policy_free() before freeing the
> policy object. This approach mirrors the error handling path in
> xfrm_add_policy(), ensuring that all associated resources are correctly
> released.
>
> Fixes: 980ebd25794f ("[IPSEC]: Sync series - acquire insert")
> Signed-off-by: Zilin Guan <zilin@....edu.cn>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Use the correct cleanup functions as per xfrm_add_policy().
> ---
> net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
--
Sabrina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists