[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251110183854.48b33b50@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:38:54 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Yongliang Gao <leonylgao@...il.com>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yongliang
Gao <leonylgao@...cent.com>, Huang Cun <cunhuang@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace/pid_list: optimize pid_list->lock contention
On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 19:49:52 +0800
Yongliang Gao <leonylgao@...il.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/pid_list.c b/kernel/trace/pid_list.c
> index 090bb5ea4a19..62082a4f60db 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/pid_list.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/pid_list.c
> @@ -138,14 +138,14 @@ bool trace_pid_list_is_set(struct trace_pid_list *pid_list, unsigned int pid)
> if (pid_split(pid, &upper1, &upper2, &lower) < 0)
> return false;
>
> - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pid_list->lock, flags);
> + read_lock_irqsave(&pid_list->lock, flags);
> upper_chunk = pid_list->upper[upper1];
> if (upper_chunk) {
> lower_chunk = upper_chunk->data[upper2];
> if (lower_chunk)
> ret = test_bit(lower, lower_chunk->data);
> }
> - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pid_list->lock, flags);
> + read_unlock_irqrestore(&pid_list->lock, flags);
>
> return ret;
> }
Unfortunately you cannot do this because this is called while holding the
task pi_lock and rq locks. In PREEMPT_RT() the read/write_lock_* turn into
mutexes.
Sebastian, is there any equivalent of raw_read/write_locks() that can be
used?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists