[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46637f07-f6dd-4a9d-aa52-0ba12b571c29@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 10:37:19 +0800
From: Wangao Wang <wangao.wang@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dikshita Agarwal <dikshita.agarwal@....qualcomm.com>,
Vikash Garodia <vikash.garodia@....qualcomm.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bod@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: wangao.wang@....qualcomm.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, quic_qiweil@...cinc.com,
quic_renjiang@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] media: qcom: iris: Improve crop_offset handling
for encoder
On 2025/11/7 18:25, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
>
>
> On 11/6/2025 9:00 AM, Wangao Wang wrote:
>> The setting of HFI_PROP_CROP_OFFSETS for the OUTPUT port is correct,
>> but on the CAPTURE port it is used to inform the firmware about the
>> ROI, so crop_offset needs to be handled accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wangao Wang <wangao.wang@....qualcomm.com>
>
> Does CROP use case work with just this patch and first one?
>
> Since you are enabling different features in your series, pls make sure
> features are working with individual patches.
>
> Thanks,
> Dikshita
>> ---
The crop for the input port works correctly with just these two patches.
--
Best Regards,
Wangao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists