[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202511101950.bIUDG3LX-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 20:12:27 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, jfalempe@...hat.com,
javierm@...hat.com, simona@...ll.ch, airlied@...il.com,
mripard@...nel.org, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/client: Support emergency restore via sysrq for
all clients
Hi Thomas,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on next-20251107]
[cannot apply to drm/drm-next drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes drm-misc/drm-misc-next drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master v6.18-rc4 v6.18-rc3 v6.18-rc2 v6.18-rc5]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Thomas-Zimmermann/drm-client-Pass-force-parameter-to-client-restore/20251107-223026
base: next-20251107
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251107142612.467817-3-tzimmermann%40suse.de
patch subject: [PATCH 2/3] drm/client: Support emergency restore via sysrq for all clients
config: powerpc64-randconfig-001-20251110 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251110/202511101950.bIUDG3LX-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 0d786b9a207aa0e6d88dde7fd9ffe0b364db69a4)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251110/202511101950.bIUDG3LX-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511101950.bIUDG3LX-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c:41:
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h:64:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'drm_client_sysrq_register' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
64 | void drm_client_sysrq_register(struct drm_device *dev)
| ^
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h:64:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
64 | void drm_client_sysrq_register(struct drm_device *dev)
| ^
| static
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h:66:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'drm_client_sysrq_unregister' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
66 | void drm_client_sysrq_unregister(struct drm_device *dev)
| ^
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h:66:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
66 | void drm_client_sysrq_unregister(struct drm_device *dev)
| ^
| static
2 warnings generated.
vim +/drm_client_sysrq_register +64 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
58
59 /* drm_client_sysrq.c */
60 #if defined(CONFIG_DRM_CLIENT) && defined(CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ)
61 void drm_client_sysrq_register(struct drm_device *dev);
62 void drm_client_sysrq_unregister(struct drm_device *dev);
63 #else
> 64 void drm_client_sysrq_register(struct drm_device *dev)
65 { }
> 66 void drm_client_sysrq_unregister(struct drm_device *dev)
67 { }
68 #endif
69
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists